I use photography and digital photographic imaging techniques to research ideas regarding place/space, context of geographies, and methods of information dissemination. I have used serial imaging, experimental image recording, and historical propaganda to explore how photography and it's digital equivalent can function as a recorder of factual information and also as a tool for manipulation and obfuscation. What are the cultural implications of a medium that is so flexible in it's veracity? Quite obviously the photographic image has proven it can function culturally in multitudes of ways: as proof of fact, as proof of value, as proof of experience, but I use the conceptual complexities of this idea to propel my work.